On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:53 -0400, Robert Joly wrote: > My main objective was to compare the availability performance of a > 'backup-registrar-based solution' against a 'slim' approach. That > 'slim' approach only uses a few attributes of the currently-proposed > solutions which are: central management, the concept of a home base for > a user and the ability to push home-base aliases for users at other > branches to all the sipXecs systems in the multi-branch deployment.
What is the "slim" approach you are testing? Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
