On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:11 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:53 -0400, Robert Joly wrote: > > My main objective was to compare the availability performance of a > > 'backup-registrar-based solution' against a 'slim' approach. That > > 'slim' approach only uses a few attributes of the currently-proposed > > solutions which are: central management, the concept of a home base for > > a user and the ability to push home-base aliases for users at other > > branches to all the sipXecs systems in the multi-branch deployment. > > What is the "slim" approach you are testing?
(Which I suspect you explained in a previous e-mail which I have had to purge already.) Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
