On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dale Worley<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:15 -0400, Paul Mossman wrote: >> I suppose sipXbridge would also need special handling for the case where >> an offer contains only disallowed codes. The behaviour would depend on >> whether the offer is in an INVITE or not... > > That case is pretty easy to fake: Add a bogus codec, > "x-no-allowed-codecs" to the codec list.
Would x-no-allowed-codecs be part of the exclude list? Not sure why anybody would want to set things up so no codecs are allowed. Would that not be equivalent to just not allowing a call at all ? At that point, I assume one would simply reject the call at sipxbridge. > > Dale > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
