On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:52 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dale Worley<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:15 -0400, Paul Mossman wrote: > >> I suppose sipXbridge would also need special handling for the case where > >> an offer contains only disallowed codes. The behaviour would depend on > >> whether the offer is in an INVITE or not... > > > > That case is pretty easy to fake: Add a bogus codec, > > "x-no-allowed-codecs" to the codec list. > > Would x-no-allowed-codecs be part of the exclude list? > Not sure why anybody would want to set things up so no codecs are allowed. > Would that not be equivalent to just not allowing a call at all ? > At that point, I assume one would simply reject the call at sipxbridge.
Sometimes the SDP offer is in the 200 response to the INVITE, and sipXbridge can't reject it. So you edit the SDP to force the caller to reject the SDP. (Which it has to do by providing an ACK for the INVITE, and then a BYE for the dialog.) Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
