Martin wrote: ... > On our (Nortel) MCS conferencing system we do not have PINs > at all. All there is is a conference bridge number. In our > case that would be the extension of the bridge. Should we > consider a default PIN that is empty and add a help text that > says that if a PIN is added the following disadvantages will occur?
As part of his XMPP work, Bob actually wrote a FreeSWITCH patch (http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODAPP-333) allowing the conference PIN to be specified with a URL parameter in the INVITE. It is general purpose, so it could also be used by the user portal as well a Polycom centralized conferencing feature. If it's accepted into FreeSWITCH, then we can easily avoid the disadvantage altogether. If there are no objections then I'll open a JIRA to cover this feature, dependent on MODAPP-333 of course. -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
