Nortel 1200 IP Phones also use the conference feature in the same fashion.
If the "Conference Server URI" field is set on sipXconfig/Phone GUI, 1200 
phone can do N-way
conferencing using the conference service URI.  For more details please 
refer Page 49 of the
following document:
http://www142.nortelnetworks.com/mdfs_app/enterprise/SCS/3.0/1200_SIP_UserGuide_NN30001-001.pdf

Thanks,
Tarru Naval Vashistha
ipDialog Support

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Mossman" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:24 PM
Subject: [sipX-dev] Polycom centralized conference feature


> Hi all,
>
> Polycom has suggested that we make use of their centralized conference
> feature.
>
> A Polycom configured with a conference bridge URI will start conferences
> on that bridge, instead of locally, when the user presses the
> 'Conference' button/softkey.  One advantage of centralized over local
> conferences is that the number of participants is not limited by the
> Polycom's resources.  (Currently 3 or 4 total participants, depending on
> the Polycom model.)
>
>
> Here's a user story: User A is in a call with User B, and they decide an
> ad-hoc conference is in order.  User A calls User C, then joins the two
> calls with the 'Conference' button.  All users are then connected to
> User A's conference bridge.  User A can then pull in more participants
> by dialing them directly, and joining then after consultation.  (Some
> users would prefer this to the user portal invite, see
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg17880.html.)  A's user
> portal can of course also be used to control the conference.
>
>
> We could implement a very basic version of this with relatively little
> work in sipXecs (see XX-6576):
>
> 1. When a user is the owner of a conference bridge, then profiles of all
> Polycoms assigned to that user will automatically have
> 'voIpProt.SIP.conference.address' set to the bridge URI.
>
> 2. The Contact header in INVITE responses from the conference bridge
> will need to have the "isfocus" tag.
>
>
> I refer to this as a basic version, because the usability suffers when
> the conference bridge is protected with a PIN.  All participants
> entering the conference will need the PIN.  But you would expect
> participants pulled in by the conference owner to be joined directly,
> without being prompted for the PIN.
>
>
> This could be solved I'm sure, but it would be challenging.  Here's why.
> A Polycom with two established calls starts the Conference by sending an
> INVITE to the bridge.  That call is established when the bridge returns
> an OK.  The Polycom then Blind Transfers (REFER without Replaces) the
> two other parties to the Contact from the bridge OK.
>
> We want the two REFER'd parties to enter the conference without a PIN.
> It may be helpful if the bridge OK uses an obfusticated Contact in lieu
> of a PIN.  But the main challenge is that the owner is prompted for the
> PIN only after the call has been established.  That is, the other
> participants are REFER'd (and will surely have sent their INVITEs)
> before the conference owner has been authenticated.
>
> The two non-owner INVITEs will need to become established calls before
> the conference starts.  They should be "held" (with MOH) and then put
> into the conference only after the owner has entered the PIN.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -Paul
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Paul
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.112/2390 - Release Date: 09/23/09 
05:52:00

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to