On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:26 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > This has to be put in context: that the mission of sipXbridge is to > interface to ITSPs and other lame systems that require hacks like > registration for the domain and intercepting REFER, _not_ to be a > general purpose interface to other SIP systems (we want those to go > direct to sipXproxy, which _would_ just return the challenge responses).
True... But do we expect ITSPs to handle 403 responses better than 401/407s? Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
