On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:16 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 14:48 -0500, Dale Worley wrote: > > In regard to having sipviewer apply annotations to the siptrace file to > > show how the file should be displayed: The annotations should have > > their own XML namespace, so the annotations can be cleanly separated > > from the trace data itself. > > What's wrong with just different element names?
It would work. But the display annotations are distinctly different semantically. Putting them in a separate namespace would clarify the distinction, and maintain separation of concerns between the programs that extract and process traces, and sipviewer. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
