On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Scott Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:10 -0500, Suchecki, Thomas AVAYA (CAR:9D80) > wrote: >> The reason I put the annotation data in the same file is for ease of >> management of the files (eg. attaching trace file to the JIRA issue, >> sending it in email, or however other way they get used). This way the >> information is self-contained and you'll never run into a situation >> where the annotation file is lost, mixed up with a different trace file, >> ... It just easier to manage. >> >> Having said that, the down said is as you said. The original file is not >> pure log data after annotations are stored. It is easy to remove the >> annotations from the log file, but then you loose the annotations. If >> the log files are often processed by other programs after sipviewer adds >> annotations then perhaps it would be worth separating the two. I don't >> know the frequency of how often that happens and which of the two >> benefits people would rather have. Easy to manage files, or pure log >> files. If the consensus is to change it I can do that. > > I strongly prefer a single file, for exactly the reasons you gave.
I prefer using a single file too. > > At present, there are no other uses of the siptrace file. There could be other uses for it... The regression test tool would use the siptrace file to drive the test. > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
