On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 17:19 -0600, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
> MikeJ of the FreeSwitch project sent me a patch (thank you!) that just
> ignores the lack of a Contact header when processing the NOTIFY
> message. This does fix the immediate problem (FreeSwitch doesn't SEGV
> and I can press 'Reject' as soon as I like and the caller goes to
> voicemail) but it still seems "wrong" (per the RFC) that the Contact
> header is missing on the NOTIFY/Ringing... message from sipXproxy.
> 
> I'm happy to help (try patches/more testing/whatever), even a shove in
> the right direction as to where to dig deeper.

You're correct that it is a bug not to send a Contact in that NOTIFY,
but you've got the wrong culprit.  The sipXproxy is just forwarding it -
that message comes from the Linksys and didn't have a Contact there
either, so you'll have to take it up with them.

If you'd like, and you can't file an issue with Linksys in some public
place, you can file an issue in the External project at
track.sipfoundry.org to record the facts.  You've done a good job of
documenting the problem (the messages in a sipviewer trace have frame
numbers - it's easier to identify them that way than copying them, but
that's a nit... good job).


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to