--- On Wed, 1/27/10, Huijun Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Huijun Yang <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [sipX-dev] XX-7365 - phonebook incremental search question > To: "Arjun Nair" <[email protected]>, "George Niculae" > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 5:38 PM > > > > As of now there are 25 open issues (4 of them in Patch > Pending), out > of which I can see about 9 that we must fix. If we are > going to keep the > > paged phonebook api in this release, then XX-7365 is a > must. IMO, with > a code complete target for the end of February, we should > be able to do > it, > but it would be at the expense of the other parts > of the project. > So, I am not sure how much more resources we are willing to > dedicate to > the > phonebook. > > > Advantages of having paged api: > > - Support for a large number of users (>700) > > Given sipXecs is really targeting at SME market, not sure > it is a > priority to focus on supporting large number of users. > IMO - Since now we are supporting google accounts import for private phonebooks I think we should have also a responsive phonebook - consider the case when the user imports contacts from gmail (> than 700) but he/she won't be able to see any entry due to this limitation George _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
