--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Paul Mossman <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Paul Mossman <[email protected]> > Subject: [sipX-dev] IM ID: Clashing with SIP User IDs/aliases? (XX-6447) > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 8:40 PM > Hi all, > > Regarding http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6447 IM ID should > also > be an alias. It's Patch-Pending, but fairly old and > not scheduled for > 4.2. > > Does anyone see a deficiency with how we are currently > handling IM IDs, > SIP User IDs, and SIP User aliases? > IMO - for 4.2 we should be good with what we have in place. Though, if we plan to support IM Id as user alias at some point in time (and unique in entire SIP namespace) would be safer to push it in now - will be harder to prevent issues like http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7455 later, on stable release. George _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
