George wrote: > --- On Wed, 2/3/10, Paul Mossman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Paul Mossman <[email protected]> > > Subject: [sipX-dev] IM ID: Clashing with SIP User IDs/aliases? > > (XX-6447) > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 8:40 PM Hi all, > > > > Regarding http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6447 IM ID > should also > > be an alias. It's Patch-Pending, but fairly old and not > scheduled for > > 4.2. > > > > Does anyone see a deficiency with how we are currently handling IM > > IDs, SIP User IDs, and SIP User aliases? > > > > IMO - for 4.2 we should be good with what we have in place. > Though, if we plan to support IM Id as user alias at some > point in time (and unique in entire SIP namespace) would be > safer to push it in now - will be harder to prevent issues > like http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7455 later, on > stable release.
Sounds good George, thanks. -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
