Dave wrote: > I'm taking a look at issues: > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7342 and > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-6944 which relate to the handling of > configuration changes for the internal SBC. > > This issue appears to be related to confusion in sipXecs between > sipXbridge's role as a service and its role as a device.
Agreed. This is confusing, both for the user and the underlying code. > In general I would recommend that we should try to make the Internal SBC > behave more like a device, I think sipXbridge should both behave and be presented as a service. (It is a service.) What purpose is served by having sipXbridge listed under Devices->SBCs? (I know from a previous thread that this causes confusion...) -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
