On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 20:06 +0530, Chitralekha wrote:
> Robert Joly wrote: 
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > This query is regarding "Joining a Conference IM Chat with 
> > > the password set" from the Pidgin Client.
> > > 
> > > I have SCS Audio conference  named "Qantom" with the 
> > > Extension as 1111 and Password  set to 999 added to SipX.
> > > Assigned IM user 400 as the owner of the 
> > > conference.Registered a pidgin client to user 400.
> > > Now I try to access conference "Qantom" from Pidgin client 
> > > TUI>>Tools>>Room List>>Get list>>Find Rooms>> Qantom.Double 
> > > click on the displayed conference "qantom" to establish a IM 
> > > conference chat.
> > > 
> > > Now after double clicking on "qantom",
> > > 
> > >                An error message "401:Not Authorized" is 
> > > displayed to the user.
> > > 
> > > Please refer the below screen shot:
> > >  
> > > <imap://chitralekha%[email protected]:143/fetch%3EUID%3E%5Es
> > >     
> > ipx-dev%20Digest%3E9587?part=1.1.1.2&filename=moz-> screenshot-65.jpg> 
> >   
> > > Kindly suggest if this is an expected behavior or an Issue?
> > > If this is an expected behavior I will raise an improvement 
> > > issue to provide an help text mentioning for the same.
> > > 
> > > NOTE:
> > > --------
> > > Conference chat is successfully established if the audio 
> > > conference "Qantom" DO NOT have password set.
> > >     
> > 
> > That is expected behavior.  Arguably, pidgin could do a better UI job
> > and prompt for a password but it is what it is.  To enter multiuser
> > chatrooms protected by a PIN, you need to add the chat as a buddy and
> > set the password property to match the PIN.  If you do that, you sohould
> > be able to enter the room.
> >   
> Thanks Bob.
> The scenario which explained works absolutely  fine.
> I think there should be help text which mention or indicates the
> same.Or there should be a help text in the sipx config ui which could
> give the information to users  that  "Avoid assigning Password while
> creating a Conference IM Chat in the Sipx".
> I will rasie an Improvement Issue for the same.

I don't think we need any issue for this - it is what it is, and it
behaves correctly.

Pidgin does a poor job displaying an authentication failure - not much
we can do about that.


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to