Shruthi wrote: ... > Query : Is this change intentional or dependent on issue : XX-7877 > <http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7877>
Can you raise a separate (Minor) issue for the misleading error message? XX-7877 is a different problem, and I don't want to confuse that issue. (Both problems were introduced by the revision 18226 fix for XX-7663 Integer validation in sipx: Tapestry validator(for integer) accepting invalid input & not throwing validation error.) Thanks. -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
