Well that didn't work as I'd planned :-(

Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676


On 4/1/2010 8:51 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
> [[off-list]]
>
> I don't understand what you mean by keep it useful...Could you please
> explain?
>
> Josh Patten
> Assistant Network Administrator
> Brazos County IT Dept.
> (979) 361-4676
>
>
> On 4/1/2010 8:49 AM, Alfred Campbell wrote:
>    
>> On 4/1/2010 9:33 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> Since IM bot is being yanked would it be possible to implement feature
>>> codes for call screening?
>>>
>>> Josh Patten
>>> Assistant Network Administrator
>>> Brazos County IT Dept.
>>> (979) 361-4676
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/1/2010 8:24 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Am I to understand that there will be no IM bot functionality in 4.2? If
>>>> that is the case then why even include the IM engine? This was one of
>>>> the main reasons I was looking forward to 4.2, namely the call screening
>>>> functionality.
>>>>
>>>> Without the IM engine the IM system is rather "ordinary" and could
>>>> easily be implemented without the aid of sipX AND be properly integrated
>>>> with LDAP. I am still taken aback that this completed feature is being
>>>> yanked.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Patten
>>>> Assistant Network Administrator
>>>> Brazos County IT Dept.
>>>> (979) 361-4676
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/1/2010 8:02 AM, Alfred Campbell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> On 4/1/2010 7:17 AM, Andy Spitzer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Woof!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:21:40 -0400,<[email protected]>       
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>        remove sipximbot from the public repository and sipX build
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>> And so it begins.  Anyone care to comment on the reason for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The Avalanche has begun. It's too late for the pebbles to vote."
>>>>>>                                   - The Vorlon Ambassador, Babylon Five
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Woof!
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Business decisions being made with respect to content and the commercial
>>>>> offering is all.
>>>>>
>>>>> This should have been communicated ahead of time and we will need to do
>>>>> a better job of that going forward. Reality is as the project matures
>>>>> there will be more content that we only put in the commercial offering.
>>>>> This doesn't mean there won't be anymore open source content.  The
>>>>> business folks at Avaya believe there is a need to have a difference in
>>>>> content between the open source and commercial offering. We can debate
>>>>> that premise however it won't change anything. Believe me when I tell
>>>>> you its all been debated...
>>>>>
>>>>> The one thing I am sorry about with this content is we never should have
>>>>> made it available IF we were going to end up removing it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On a positive note really hoping we can release 4.2 soon. Just working
>>>>> out some last bugs. When this query hits zero you should see an open
>>>>> source release:
>>>>> http://track.sipfoundry.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+XX+AND+priority+in+%28Blocker%2C+Critical%29+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%224.1.7%22+ORDER+BY+key+DESC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
>>>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>>>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
>>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> Josh understand the frustration but try to keep it useful....
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>    
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to