On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:13 -0400, Picher, Michael wrote:
> Wasn't some of that work done before Avaya?
> 
> And how can something, under the licensing, be contributed and yanked
> back (not being an expert of the licensing, I don't know).

Let's not go down the rathole in which we pretend to be lawyers... it's
not productive.  Very simply though:

All of that functionality was contributed by Avaya (or Nortel, which is
the same thing, since Avaya bought all of Nortels rights when they
bought our division), so we have not removed any contribution made by
anyone outside (that would, at the very least have been very poor form).
While it might technically be legal for Avaya to do that, I don't think
anyone here would argue in favor of it, and personally I'd lie down in
front of the bulldozer over that if it did happen.

Nothing in the project license requires the project to actually
incorporate any contribution - the license requires that if someone
changes the code they must contribute the change back, not that the
project use that change.

As Al said, this change was the subject of a long and difficult debate
inside Avaya (those of us arguing that it should not be pulled lost,
obviously).  It has been agreed that in the future we should only make
these decisions in advance - if we start it in open source, then it
should stay there, and if we think we're going to keep a feature
exclusive to the commercial version then it should not ever be in the
open source.

Back to my vacation...


_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to