Scott wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:22 -0400, Mossman, Paul (Paul) wrote: > > Scott wrote: > > > > Could we replace the "Unmanaged" SBC Route with > Outbound Proxy and > > > > Outbound Proxy Port settings on "pure" SIP Trunks? > > > > > > I'd prefer that we not call it a proxy, because it almost > certainly > > > isn't a proxy. If you think it's an improvement, I have > no problem > > > with changing 'Unmanaged' to 'External' or even 'Outbound'. > > > > So we can get rid of the "Unmanaged" type of SBC Routes. Excellent! > > Where did you get that from? If someone has some unmanaged > SBC (Ingate, Acme Packet, whatever) they need to be able to > configure routes to/through it.
See above. We could add Outbound Address & Outbound Port settings to "pure" SIP Trunks. To route a SIP Trunk's calls through an unmanaged SBC, then just configure the SBC's address/port right on the SIP Trunk. Same net effect as the association to an "Unmanaged" SBC Route, except much simpler. (And yes, upgrades could preserve the pre-upgrade behaviour.) Make sense? -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
