> -----Original Message----- > From: Cheung, Carson (Carson) > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:31 AM > > Carolyn wrote: > >No. TLS Peer is an optional add on to apply permissions to > calls coming in from a trusted peer. Otherwise they come in > with no permissions, and rules that don't require permissions > work. TLS Peer has nothing to do with TLS authentication > (which is done by adding the appropriate CA). > > So it sounds like the optional TLS Peer need only be created > to apply permissions. > Therefore, it is pointless to create a TLS Peer without > associating a permissions with it, although it won't be > "wrong" to do so. > I think this is where Paul thinks why it would be confusing. > > Since it is not "wrong", perhaps a warning to the user is > more appropriate ?? > Please comment. > > Thanks, > > Carson
I think this summary is correct. I'm not sure that it is worth any work on our part to prevent an admin from doing something pointless, or to warn them about it - this just gives us more code to test, translate, ... Carolyn _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
