> >On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Tony Graziano ><[email protected]> wrote: >> Good to know. It certainly varies site to site. I think Ranga was >> considering conference recordings, so a 90 minute recording could >> easily be around 100MB (+/-). 10 per month is a gig, and 12 months is >> 12GB. So depending upon use cases, I see how it could get very large >> indeed. > >10 conferences per month is easy to envision. > >Perhaps a good middle ground could be that voicemail is not compressed >whereas conference recordings are compressed. Another middle ground >could be to run an archiver that compresses conference recordings and >voice mails after a few days. If the user wanted to play archived >recordings, he would need to download them, unzip and play. > >Ranga
Maybe I am missing something, but why zip? The proposed user experience to download, unzip and then listen seems very cumbersome. There are so many compression techniques invented for audio, why not use one of them? --martin _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
