On 2010-06-25 13:01, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > Except for one thing. Avaya remains in control of > the some pretty important resources that the community depends on. If > Avaya needs to take a break to figuring out their plans (and I'm not > faulting them for it - it needs to be done) the rest of the project > should not be in limbo. Avaya is a contributor, not an owner of the > community effort no matter how much code they contribute. The way it > should happen is there should be a public SVN that the community > controls and contributes to, and Avaya contributes back their stuff as > well. I don't believe the current state is an attempt by Avaya to > control the project, rather that it is just the way things have been > done till now. So the community needs to come together to figure out how > that is going to work. > Avaya (and I am no longer with the company), has picked up where Nortel left off with funding the infrastructure. Whatever the issues with the current ongoing svn main blackout, they've funded an outstanding hosting arrangement (if anyone is considering any Atlassian hosted services, I could not recommend anyone but Contegix), and the dollars are not insignificant (far more than SIPfoundry has ever had by any other means).
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
