I understand exactly what you mean since I can not start 'named'
without having had 'su' to 'root', so that may be true.
I ran it again without 'sudo' and I was able to track back as you
previously stated to the issue here:
-------------------------------
 1) Error:
test_migrate(MailstoreMigrateTest):
Errno::EACCES: Permission denied - /tmp/mailstore-3.6.tmp/.svn/props
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1275:in `rmdir'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1275:in `remove_dir1'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1286:in `platform_support'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1274:in `remove_dir1'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1267:in `remove'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:748:in `remove_entry'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1319:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1319:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1323:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1318:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1317:in `each'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1317:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1318:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1317:in `each'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1317:in `postorder_traverse'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:746:in `remove_entry'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:604:in `rm_r'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:600:in `each'
    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:600:in `rm_r'
    ../../../sipXconfig/bin/test/sipx-upgrade-3.6-mailstore_test.rb:16:in
`test_migrate'

1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors
FAIL: test/sipx-upgrade-3.6-mailstore_test.rb
---------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't get this when I do 'sudo', but would your suggestion be for
this situation?
And, FYI, I do only build as the user 'sipx'. I did have to do 'sudo'
on commands prior to the 'make build' command. Could this also be part
of this issue?

Thanks again, Dale! This is really helpful!

-William


On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:00 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of W. E. W. Russell 
> [[email protected]]
>
> Thanks for your help, Dale. But now I have another issue that I
> haven't seen before:
> ------------------------------------------------------
> [TEST]:SipSrvLookupTest::lookup
>
> SipSrvLookup::servers("test2", "sip", OsSocket::UNKNOWN, -1) returns:
>        [END]
>
> Failed test seq. no. 2, named 'test2'
> Expected results were:
> 1.2.1.0:5060,0,1000.000,0,UDP
> 1.2.1.0:5060,0,1000.000,0,TCP
>
> Actual results were:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> I don't know exactly what's going wrong here, but it looks like the 
> sipXtackLib test can't run named.  Supposedly the auto-configuration system 
> should tell detect the user can't run named and skip those tests.  But I 
> suspect that your "sudo make" is causing trouble.  Or worse, that you're not 
> consistently building under *one* user.  (If you've built using the same 
> directories as more than one user, remove it and build from a fresh 
> checkout.)  In any case, you can make the problem go away by making named 
> executable to everybody.  (There is no security problem, as it is not 
> set-uid.)  Do "chmod a+x /usr/sbin/named".
>
> Dale
>



-- 
William Eugene Ward Russell
incNETWORKS, Inc.
198 Brighton Avenue
Long Branch NJ 07740
Member of Technical Staff (System Integration)
Cell Phone # 732-744-6483
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to