Dale

Great news - thanks to you and Al and the other contributors for offering it
back.
Let us know when you are ready.
--martin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:sipx-dev-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5:46 PM
> To: Jean-Hugues Royer
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sipx-dev] RLS Problems (4.2.1)
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Jean-Hugues Royer [[email protected]]
> 
> Here is one with multiple Accept lines (like RFC4662 examples) which is
> rejected:
> ________________________________________
> 
> There's a big patch to 4.2 coming over the wall.  It includes:
> 
> Fixing this problem
> Hoa Nguyen's work on incrementally updating the RLS's data structures
> A much more careful handling of delays during the updating process so
> that changes are processed faster but also avoid any lockups due to
> internal queues filling.
> Some bug fixes and minor improvements in related code.
> 
> The RLS should be good for up to 2,000 monitored phones with these
> changes.
> 
> BTW, the reason that multiple Accept lines *must* be accepted is not
> the RFC 4662 examples (because examples aren't specifications), but
> rather this passage in RFC 3261 section 7.3:
> 
>    [H4.2] also specifies that multiple header fields of the same field
>    name whose value is a comma-separated list can be combined into one
>    header field.  That applies to SIP as well, but the specific rule is
>    different because of the different grammars.  Specifically, any SIP
>    header whose grammar is of the form
> 
>       header  =  "header-name" HCOLON header-value *(COMMA header-
> value)
> 
>    allows for combining header fields of the same name into a comma-
>    separated list.
> 
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to