Not knowing a whole lot about this parameter, I think it should be configurable with full description on implications of turning it on.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone have an opinion that the tag > <loose-route-invite>true</loose-route-invite> > should be made configurable in sipxbridge? > I ran across one tempermental ITSP that requires it (supposedly). I can edit > it and restart services to temporarily see if that changes the "reason' they > are failing the calls (according to them). > I suspect that as a TRUNK, ;lr is not an issue, but it is on the handsets > only depending on the switch/switch type you connect to. I think this is a > case of an ITSP "calling" themselves commercial and really centered around > residential/consumer traffic so they require this to be OFF from the client > (i.e.no ;lr tag). This is the kind of thing that makes me want to say "run > very fast, get a real provider", but I wanted opinions. > I suspect it might be relatively easy to add the option to make it > configurable, but realistically, is it resonable for a trunk provider to > refuse a call because it is there. I think it is NOT reasonable, but that's > me. > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.326.5325 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: [email protected] > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://support.myitdepartment.net > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
