[email protected] wrote: > Send sipx-dev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sipx-dev digest..." > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [please change the subject line when replying] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Alert-Info header adding for gateway calls (David Becker) > 2. Ldap (Kumaran) > 3. Re: Ldap (Cristi Starasciuc) > 4. Re: Alert-Info header adding for gateway calls (Joegen Baclor) > 5. Re: Conference without Owner (Cristi Starasciuc) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [sipx-dev] Alert-Info header adding for gateway calls > From: > David Becker <[email protected]> > Date: > Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:55:59 +0100 > To: > [email protected] > > To: > [email protected] > > > Am 17.01.2011 16:44, schrieb Douglas Hubler: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:12 AM, David Becker >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We're looking into having phones play different ringtones when >>> called by >>> an external number as opposed to an internal one using the alert-info >>> header. Is there any existing functionality for this? If not, which >>> component would be the most suited for adding this value to SIP traffic >>> from the gateway? >> sipXproxy and sipXregistrar both have plugin architectures. Question >> is, would they have a list of the gateways to identify and would they >> be allowed to modify the SIP message which I believe you need. >> Outside that, fronting the sipXproxy with another proxy like opensips, >> kamailio, openser, opensbc... might be another option. >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > Since we'd like to avoid adding a second proxy, how would one go about > adding a plugin to the proxy? If plugins are not capable of doing this > job, could we modify the proxy itself? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > [sipx-dev] Ldap > From: > Kumaran <[email protected]> > Date: > Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:04:22 +0530 > To: > [email protected] > > To: > [email protected] > > > Hi All, > I have certain problem in mapping attributes.So please send me > correct procedure to install ldap along with mapping attributes.. > > Regards > Venkateshwaran > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [sipx-dev] Ldap > From: > Cristi Starasciuc <[email protected]> > Date: > Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:36:49 +0200 > To: > sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]> > > To: > sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]> > > > On 01/18/2011 02:34 PM, Kumaran wrote: >> Hi All, >> I have certain problem in mapping attributes.So please send me >> correct procedure to install ldap along with mapping attributes.. >> >> Regards >> Venkateshwaran >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ >> > Hi, > > have you checked out > http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/LDAP+Integration ? > > Please say if the page is not clear enough so we can improve. > > C Hi Cristi For Basic LDAP setup and importing users that link information is fine. What name should give in place of name Name text box in LDAP page Regards Venkateshwaran T > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [sipx-dev] Alert-Info header adding for gateway calls > From: > Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> > Date: > Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:30:38 +0800 > To: > sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]> > > To: > sipXecs developer discussions <[email protected]> > > > I don't think this can be done using plugins since plugins are only > given access to the request and not the responses. You of course > could modify the proxy code to insert the alert-info header for 18x > responses. You may also do this in sipXbridge if it is in the middle > of the flow. > > On Tuesday, 18 January, 2011 05:55 PM, David Becker wrote: >> Am 17.01.2011 16:44, schrieb Douglas Hubler: >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:12 AM, David Becker >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We're looking into having phones play different ringtones when >>>> called by >>>> an external number as opposed to an internal one using the alert-info >>>> header. Is there any existing functionality for this? If not, which >>>> component would be the most suited for adding this value to SIP >>>> traffic >>>> from the gateway? >>> sipXproxy and sipXregistrar both have plugin architectures. Question >>> is, would they have a list of the gateways to identify and would they >>> be allowed to modify the SIP message which I believe you need. >>> Outside that, fronting the sipXproxy with another proxy like opensips, >>> kamailio, openser, opensbc... might be another option. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ >> Since we'd like to avoid adding a second proxy, how would one go about >> adding a plugin to the proxy? If plugins are not capable of doing this >> job, could we modify the proxy itself? >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [sipx-dev] Conference without Owner > From: > Cristi Starasciuc <[email protected]> > Date: > Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:37:26 +0200 > To: > [email protected] > > To: > [email protected] > > > On 01/18/2011 08:40 AM, Kumaran wrote: >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Subject: >>> Re: [sipx-dev] Conference without Owner >>> From: >>> Douglas Hubler<[email protected]> >>> Date: >>> Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:30:03 -0500 >>> To: >>> sipXecs developer discussions<[email protected]> >>> >>> To: >>> sipXecs developer discussions<[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Kumaran >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I have Created a Conf Ext-333 without Assigning a owner.Check >>>> the Below scenario >>>> >>>> 1.In Phone: >>>> Dial 333 from 200,The call is established and Prompt is >>>> played >>>> Enter the Conference Pin >>>> 2.In Config UI >>>> Navigate to Participant Page, enter 200 in Invite >>>> Participants >>>> Box then click on Invite Participants button.It displaying a message >>>> "200 has been invited to this conference" >>>> >>>> My first scenario was correct.So no problem. >>>> Second scenario was not bug means then if we try to invite >>>> participants through Config UI. Why the Config UI displays a message >>>> "200 has been invited to this conference" after inviting 200 in Invite >>>> Participants Box ? >>>> It should display message like "you cannot invite participant >>>> until assigning a owner" or the Participant page should be inactive >>>> until assigning a owner >>>> >>> Questions >>> - Why would user 200 invite themselves when they are already on the >>> call? >>> - Why do assume you need an owner to be able invite people to a >>> conference? Maybe it's a good assumption, I'm just asking because I'm >>> not very familiar with this feature. >>> >>> >> Hi Douglas, >> Let me re-pharse my query....My scenario is mentioned below >> is in Admin portal and not in user portal >> 1.In Admin Portal,Create a conference without a owner >> say-333 >> 2.Get in to the Conference Ext-333 and navigate >> Participants screen >> 3.Enter a valid user extension(201) in Invite >> participants Textbox then Click on Invite participants >> 4.It displays a message that "201 has been invited to >> this conference" But user 201 phone is not ringing >> Note: >> 1.We cannot invite Participant Admin portal until >> assigning the owner >> 2.If we assign a owner then only auto-record option will >> displayed >> Question: >> Why the Config UI throws a message that "201 has been >> invited to this conference" This message should not displayed >> Instead of above message, 1.the Config UI should display a >> message that " you cannot invite Participant until assigning a owner" or >> 2. Invite Participant button should be disable until assigning a >> owner like Dial plan( for eg: we cannot enable a international dial >> plan until adding a gateway) or >> 3.The Participant option not be active until assigning a owner >> for conference Ext >> Consider above 3 message may be an improvement >> Check the dev-list discussions : >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04995.html >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09310.html >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04793.html >> Regards >> Venkateshwaran T >> > > Displaying the invited user message is definitely misleading. > Please raise a Jira. > Regarding the ability to invite a user when a conference has no owner, > I am not familiar with this either. > Mention it in the Jira and we'll look into it. > > C > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev >
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
