Ok thanks for the info. We are trying to build a c++ plugin for CAC functionality, so don't need to build the entire project I guess, so perhaps this won't be any trouble using a centOS compiled plugin on red hat? Many thanks in advance.
Henry -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Hubler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: woensdag 16 maart 2011 19:20 To: sipXecs developer discussions Cc: Henry Dogger Subject: Re: [sipx-dev] Building release-4.2 On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Henry Dogger <[email protected]> wrote: > No we are using the CentOS ISO installation for our production systems, > and a client of ours is using the Red Hat distribution with 4.2.1 > What combination do you recommend? We want to build in 4.2.1 for a > CentOS installation and for a Red Hat installation Build on latest CentOS, I do. I recall one issue w/RHEL, it didn't have rsyslog so you might have to build/copy that on/from centos and make available to RHEL machine. Otherwise you should be good. CentOS is supposed to be binary compatible, i've always seen that to be true. you might run into this as well, if you do, speak up http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9374 Starting with sipXecs 4.4 and greater, you can use Fedora and cross build for any centos or fedora version thanks to the integration of mock to build rpms. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
