Thanks for the verification and JIRA entry. Sent from my iPad
On Aug 5, 2011, at 2:07 AM, Kumaran T <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, Max comment is valid.If we dial 101 from user in which VM is disabled at first it play the prompt "Enter your Pin or login as different user press pound" then if you enter the pin it play the prompt "That pin is not valid" and "Please Enter your Pin or login as different user press pound".I hope its not a configuration issue or bug.Its designed to play the prompt "That pin is not valid".Confirmed this behavior in latest build of both 4.5.2 and 4.4.0.I already raise improvement in Jira " http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9797";<http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9797>..May be sipXecs developers could provide the some help of working behavior.. -- --Regards,-- --Venkateshwaran T-- On 8/5/2011 5:35 AM, Matt White wrote: Thats weird. It should access for your extension. Thats the "normal" behavior. I think your hitting a bug or a configuration issue. -M >>> Max DiOrio <[email protected]> <[email protected]> 08/04/11 4:26 PM >>> That would be an acceptable alternative, but it's not what happens. sipXecs (4.4.0- 2011-06-22EDT12:09:21 ip-10-72-38-198) Dialing 101 (or the messages button, same thing) from a line with the voicemail permission unchecked still prompts the user to enter their PIN, then says that is an invalid pin number, please try again. On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Matt White <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not get the same response as you do. > > If a non-vm user dials the message button they are prompted for the > exension first, rather than a voicemail password. > > Which is the desired response so non-vm users can check shared or other vm > boxes.? If I type in the ext of a non-vm user then I get an "invalid" > response. > > Now, as to Kumaran issue, that seems like a great improvement.? Perhaps > something as easy as an option that enables a forward to an AA when there is > no vm box.? Then that AA can have any message or option the admin chooses. > > -M > >>> Max DiOrio <[email protected]> 08/04/11 6:25 AM >>> > > I have a question in a similar vein. If voicemail is disabled for a > user and they press the message key and enter a password, it just says > that the password is invalid. By disabling the voicemail, are we just > setting an impossible to guess vm password on the box, or actually > disabling voicemail for that user? I'd like it to say "this extension > does not have a voicemail box." or something similar. > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Kumaran T <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > If Vm is disabled for the user 200.And some other user calls 8200 > > to deposit a VM the prompt will be played "The extensions is not > > valid.Thank u good bye".So this prompt will create confusion whether the > > extension is valid or not.So I hope changing the prompt will a better > > idea like "The extension does not contain VM permission.Thank u good bye" > > > > -- > > --Regards,-- > > --Venkateshwaran T-- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ -- --Regards,-- --Venkateshwaran T-- _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
