On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote:

> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote:
> ****
>
> I don't necessarily agree with that position.  We did discuss this at
> Colab,
> and I agree with you that there is a concern for the Group configuration
> process.   Because of that, I am recommending only the Firmware be in the
> separate directories, while the configuration files remain in the TFTP root
> directory.  There are mechanisms included in the Polycom phones to support
> this, and in fact it is being used today for the support of the older
> legacy
> phones.
>
> Phone model is a designation made by Polycom, where phone group is a
> sipXecs
> feature.  The problem I see with only planning by group today is there are
> some phones that will operate on one version, while other models of phones
> will only operate on different versions.  Over time this could continue to
> happen based on changes in the Polycom product line, and changes to
> firmware
> for individual phone models.
>
> I can envision a group of phones that is made up of several models of
> phones
> - for example a medical staff.  Some may have 550's, while others have
> VVX500 phones, still others 335.  Today, within sipXecs, these would
> require
> at least two different versions to be supported.****
>
> ** **
>
> I fail to see the point. If one group is designated to have 3.x firmware
> and another group 4.x firmware, this would suffice and would be part of the
> device template most likely.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> This is exactly the confusion Tony.  Groups don’t have different firmware,
> Polycom Phone models do.  The device template doesn’t have anything to do
> with the Firmware version the phone is picking up, it is all related to the
> phone and its model number only.  There isn’t a method in configuration
> today to tell the phone what Firmware to use, and I don’t see a reason to
> build that into the system with the way Polycom works today.
>

The phone group should be able to become the master "container" of the
"firmware" used. It could certainly be an option.

> ****
>
>
> The Polycom firmware today has changed to where it has either one combined
> SIP.ld file that contains all of the firmware for all of the phones and the
> phone downloads it and pulls out its specific firmware file, or you can
> download the split version which has a discrete file for each model of
> phone
> and only that file is downloaded to the phone.  It's a simple designation
> within the naming of the file.  The phones will find the correct file based
> on its model number, and the directory that it is pointed to for searching
> and download only that file, regardless of the sipXecs group that it is
> configured into.
>
> The configuration files do get downloaded, and contain Group specific
> configuration parameters.   However, keeping this all in the root directory
> makes it easy to make group changes, as you have suggested, while having
> the
> Firmware in separate directories does make it easy to have multiple
> versions
> of the firmware running on the system.  Oh course, you could have multiple
> versions of firmware placed in the TFTP root, but I suspect it would become
> cumbersome to deal with.****
>
> ** **
>
> I think over time the 2.x and 3.x stuff would make a lot less difference.
> ****
>
> Agreed, and once it is gone, then that section of the GUI can be
> completely removed – a trivial task, or potentially used for the next
> iteration from Polycom.****
>
> If someone has a need to support them long term, then they can manually
> configure the 000000000000.cfg file.****
>
>
> BTW, there is a mechanism for having just a specific phone have one
> version,
> while an identical model could run a different version of the firmware.
>
> All of this said, there needs to be serious discussion about an overall
> Polycom architecture for the long term benefit of the project.****
>
> ** **
>
> I think I have some volunteers lined up for this effort (4.x) and that
> will proceed without the need for architecture discussion, because really
> it is a two part discussion anyway (three in my view).****
>
> Explain?****
>
> **
>
1. Re-writing the sipxconfig field name/values for configuration
2. Containerizing (is that a word) the firmware b phone group to allocate
the proper firmware.
3. Adding new feature to new fimrware and sending profiles based on
"profile name" instead of mac address (i.e. login/logout of phone via xhtml
to get the profile to load, hot reloading of phones without reboot, new
features like pin-locking, etc.).

> **
>
> ** **
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 5:22 PM
> To: sipXecs developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [sipx-dev] Support for 4.0.2+ and beyond firmware for Polycom
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I’d like to suggest that a new section be added to the Device file
> > section of the GUI for the Polycom phones.   Today, there exists a
> > section for uploading Firmware (current) and for adding Firmware for
> > legacy phones.  I’d like to propose a temporary section for adding the
> > 3.3.x versions of Firmware also.
>
> I would think controlling firmware version by phone group would be more
> useful then by phone model.
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.465.6833
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Linked-In Profile:
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
> Ask about our Internet Fax services!
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~****
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:****
>
> Telephone: 434.984.8426****
>
> sip: [email protected]****
>
> ** **
>
> Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net****
>
> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net****
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Linked-In Profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
Ask about our Internet Fax services!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: [email protected]

Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net
Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to