Still think there is something in the programming of your ATA. Is the phone registering via IP or DNS name? If by IP, make sure you have specified the IP address as an alias, then activate it in your dialing plan.
>>> Graeme Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/7/2008 7:15:03 AM >>> If I change the proxy setting to point at our old SipX server, and change nothing else on the 488, DTMF works...... On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 07:11 -0400, Picher, Michael wrote: > Either the phone or the gateway... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sipx-users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graeme Allen > > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 8:15 PM > > To: sipx-users > > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] problem in dtmf detection > > > > Bump.... > > > > Is the DTMF problem a bug with 3.10.2, or should I be looking at > > something local....?? > > > > > > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 13:42 +1000, Graeme Allen wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I am running version 3.10.2 installed from ISO (Centos), and have > > also found that DTMF reception seems completely broken for Voicemail > > and AA. > > > > > > I tried the same endpoints with an older version of SipX, and DTMF > > works fine. > > > > > > Is this a known bug, is there a work-around or fix coming? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Graeme. > > > ----------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > It's hard to believe it's an issue in both stable and dev versions. > > Perhaps you > > > have a misconfiguration in either a gateway or your UA as it relates > > to the > > > media type being passed. > > > > > > This is seen when the UA or gateway (or both) do not have proper > DTMF > > setting > > > for SIP. What UA's/gateways are you using? > > > > > > >>> "kavita gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/23/08 07:05 AM >>> > > > hi all, > > > > > > There is problem in dtmf detection in voicemail and auto attendent > in > > stable > > > and unstable versions. > > > As sipx user (extension) doesn't recognize any key when the wav > > file is > > > playing for voicemail( extension 101) and for auto attendent ( > > extension > > > 100).Do anyone have idea regarding this? > > > > > > Thanks Kavita > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
