On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Tony Graziano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sipX is somewhat independent, as it does not handle the media unless it > is recording or negotiating it. The two endpoints and the > gateways/b2bUA's would actually handle that, so whatever they send would > "pass through" in a fax scenario. > > The only way sipX would "handle it" is if you were using t.38 through > the sipXbridge component to register or use an ITSP. To that end, if > that's what you are doing or where you are headed, it would help if you > explained your call flow to describe your endpoints. > > For example: > > Using an Ingate you could register/use an ITSP for siptrunks. IF the > ITSP supports t.38, the ingate WILL pass it through. If you have a DID > setup for a fax device the interface to that device will need to support > t.38. Internally here, We use patton gateways since they support t.38 > for this reason. > > I'm not sure if sipXbridge supports this yet though. sipx-dev list is a > good place to ask if you are using sipxbridge.
Sipxbridge has been tested for sending and receiving both G3 (T-38) and SG3 ( G711 ). T.38 fax was tested using the HP fax back testing service. SipXbridge is still in development so you will need to use the unstable repository if you wish to try it. Ranga >>>> Buzukelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/25/08 19:19 PM >>> > Hello all. does sipx supports t.38 ? if both of backends : UAC and > gatevay > supports. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
