On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 07:19 -0500, Marden Marshall wrote:

> On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Bas Driessen wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone have SipXecs rpms (+ dependencies etc) available for  
> > download for Fedora 10 64 bit (x86_64)? As this is not available  
> > from the Web Site, I am making an attempt to build it myself, but it  
> > is quiet a project for just an end-user. I understand Fedora is  
> > heavily used, so hopefully there is be something out there :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bas.
> >
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We should have Fedora 10 32-bit and 64-bit builds available early next  
> month.  If using Fedora is not a hard requirement then I would suggest  
> either using our CentOS 5 or openSUSE 11.1 64-bit builds.  The CentOS  
> 5 builds are available now and the openSUSE builds will be available  
> this Friday.  I recommend either one of these over a Fedora based  
> build as they have ties to commercial distributions and therefore are  
> more thoroughly vetted.
> 
> -Mardy
> 


Thanks Mardy for your quick reply.  As I am unfamiliar with SipXecs, I
first want to give it bit of a test drive. To do so, I was hoping that
that would work on F10, the platform I am working with. I agree that in
a production situation a more solid enterprise setup is the way to go.
So my alternative at this stage then for testing would be to run it in a
Virtual Machine I guess. How about if I take the SRPMS from Fedora 10
i386 and build that on x86_64. Would that be a straightforward process
or will there be many hurdles on my way if I go down that path.

As soon as there are (beta) F10 x86_64 rpms available, is it possible to
announce that on this list?

Bas.

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to