On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 17:56 +0200, dimitris(yahoo) wrote: > I have tested the following with 3.10.2 : > My server is behind my router(NAT) , listening to ip 192.168.0.10. My router > do not have static IP, so I managed to do it with dyndns. The interesting > point is that I have managed to establish a connection with 2 > softphones(xlite), that were behind a different NAT, using stunserver.org. > The signaling was fine, the rtp streaming was perfect(meaning the voice > quality) but I faced 2 problems: > a. Each call, had only 30 seconds of "life" (limitation of stunserver???) > b. The DTMF of the softphone were not working for having access e.g. to > voicemail(normaly, when the server and the softphones are behind the same > NAT, there were no problem)
sipX 3.10 does not do NAT compensation. If you have a phone or SBC that is prepared to do all the needed work, then sipX will work. But for most situations without a sophisticated SBC, you need to use 3.11/4.0. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
