Thanks Scott for your reply,

I am not interested in Media handling there is no rtp handling like ACD.
Simple Signaling is to be done.
So What should be the configuration of a machine that can handle 10000
user Signaling.

Forget Load Balancing.
We can do that but I am more interested to know about single Machine
configuration that can handle the 10000 users.

I have tested 4000 users on Intel Quad Core with 2 GB Ram and the
Success ratio was 85% calls got matured.

That's why I am much more interested to know specific h/w requirement for Sipx.
Any Body have an experience in load testing of sipx please share his views.


Regads,
Vikas

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Scott Lawrence
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:09 +0530, VG wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please Specify what should be the minimum H/W requirement for Sipx if
>> No. of Port are 10,000(ten thousand).
>
> If by Port you mean users, you'd want a pretty robust platform.  The
> specifics will vary depending on what services you plan to offer and how
> you expect them to be used.  Any of the services that do media handling
> (ACD, Voicemail, Conferencing) require more memory and more cpu power
> than the services that just do signalling (the proxy and
> registry/redirect service).
>
>> Whether Sipx Support the Distributed Server Architecture means
>> Registrar on a Single Machine and Proxy on other Machine.
>
> That is possible with manual configuration, but is not recommended -
> there's no advantage to doing it that way.  It is better to have the
> proxy and registrar on the same box.
>
> For that many users, you'll want to have redundant proxy/registrar
> systems both high availability and for load sharing.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to