On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 15:32 -0400, Dale Worley wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 15:25 -0400, Matt Keys wrote:
> > > You're sending a REGISTER inward through sipXbridge, which should
> be
> > > OK
> > > in principle. Though the Asterisk is trying to register itself as
> > > "sip:[email protected]" -- is that a defined extension on
> your
> > > sipXecs system?
> > >
> > Yes--it also has an alias of 4527 and Mauer.
> >
> > > Given that the response says "Server: sipXecs/4.0.1
> > > sipXecs/sipxbridge",
> > > it appears that sipXbridge is rejecting the request. I'm not sure
> why
> > > that would be, but I suspect that if the bridge allowed the
> request,
> > > the
> > > REGISTER would still fail due to the alleged extension number.
> > >
> > > Dale
> >
> > How do I trace down the specific reason for a denial?
>
> I'd ask Ranga, who wrote sipXbridge. And if you had responded to my
> message via sipx-users rather than privately, he would see this
> question.
>
> Dale
>
>
Sorry about that, I forgot that it doesn't automatically enter the list
in a reply.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
