On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 08:28 -0400, Matt White wrote: > Official answer from Bandtel > > "we do not support reinvite without an SDP, this is a grey area in the > RFC it is not a rule that is a MUST.
Nobody on the IETF SIP mailing lists would agree with that. For example, in RFC 3261, section 14.1, "Modifying an existing session/UAC behavior": The same offer-answer model that applies to session descriptions in INVITEs (Section 13.2.1) applies to re-INVITEs. [...] Of course, a UAC MAY send a re-INVITE with no session description, in which case the first reliable non-failure response to the re-INVITE will contain the offer (in this specification, that is a 2xx response). Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
