Does 4.1 have a release date? From looking at the roadmap, it appears 
4.2 is the next proposed release. Maybe I'm reading something incorrectly.
I have helped a few of the users get by with the personal attendant, but 
I would like to give them an idea as to when I will have something that 
could fix their issue.

On 1/26/2010 8:57 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Tony Graziano
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>    
>> I don't know what "206 no peers available" means from sipxbridge.
>>      
> Well, there are two problems at hand here. The 481 error from
> sipxbridge on the re-INVITE -- I believe this to be a sipxbridge bug
> that I have fixed already in 4.1. You can give that a try.
> However, I am curious about why verizon  issending a re-INVITE as soon
> as the call is. Perhaps it does not like the fact that you are using
> 10.87.20.5 address in your call setup.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ranga.
>
>
>
>    
>> Perhaps someone else can help?
>> ============================
>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>> Fax: 434.984.8431
>>
>> Email: [email protected]
>>
>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>> Fax: 434.984.8427
>>
>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: [email protected]<[email protected]>
>> To: Tony Graziano<[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tue Jan 26 21:12:55 2010
>> Subject: Re: Can't forward from external number to external number
>>
>> Just 1. 95% of my users have 1 line assigned to 1 phone, and everyone is
>> definitely having the issue.
>>
>> On 1/26/2010 8:01 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
>>      
>>> How many phones is your line registered on?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:40 PM, [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>  <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>      Ok. Lets try this again. I think I have some better data now
>>>      thanks to some help from Tony. I waited until nobody was on my
>>>      system, moved all the logs out, immediately made a test call, and
>>>      then immediately moved those calls to a temp directory. I ran
>>>      merge-logs in that temp directory, opened it in sipviewer, and
>>>      attached the merged.xml that was created.
>>>      In this test, I was calling from 6155008073 (my cell phone) to
>>>      6159253043 (my Sipx/Desk phone) which was set in the Sipx GUI to
>>>      forward to 6155914780 (my home phone). My home phone rung, and the
>>>      call was dropped as soon as I answered it. I didn't try to mask
>>>      any of my phone numbers in the logs this time.
>>>
>>>      I have to guess the 2 parts from merged.xml below indicate a
>>>      problem. Googling '481 Peer dialog is null' doesn't get too many hits.
>>>      Sorry for not sending correct or helpful information earlier.
>>>      Hopefully what I'm sending now is a little more helpful. I didn't
>>>      think I needed to send a screenshot from sipviewer, but I will be
>>>      glad to if that would help.
>>>
>>>      Thank you all for your help,
>>>      Matthew
>>>
>>>      Time: 2010-01-27T01:16:12.311000Z
>>>      Frame: 29 sipxbridge.xml:378
>>>
>>>      Source: nshpbx1.sipx.voip-sipXbridge
>>>      Dest: 10.87.20.5:5060<http://10.87.20.5:5060>
>>>
>>>      SIP/2.0 481 Peer dialog is null
>>>      Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>      10.87.20.5;branch=z9hG4bK-sipXecs-19e8a5983eb41c5558b4327c16988037cc75
>>>      Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>      10.87.20.5:5090;branch=z9hG4bKeca98329a090bdd96d9d633f294be82f333631
>>>      CSeq: 917280447 INVITE
>>>      Call-ID: [email protected]
>>>      From: "WIRELESS CALLER"<sip:[email protected]
>>>
>>> <mailto:sip%[email protected]>;user=phone>;tag=2099232641-1264554945912-
>>>      To: "DSI HOLDING COMPANY 251 DSI Corp"
>>>      <sip:[email protected]>;tag=9df1f5b6
>>>
>>>      Server: sipXecs/4.0.4 sipXecs/sipxbridge (Linux)
>>>      Contact:<sip:[email protected]:5090
>>>      <http://[email protected]:5090>>
>>>      Supported: replaces,100rel
>>>      Content-Length: 0
>>>
>>>      Time: 2010-01-27T01:16:12.321000Z
>>>      Frame: 33 sipxbridge.xml:383
>>>
>>>      Source: nshpbx1.sipx.voip-sipXbridge
>>>      Dest: 172.30.209.62:5070<http://172.30.209.62:5070>
>>>
>>>      SIP/2.0 481 Call leg/Transaction does not exist
>>>      Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>      172.30.209.62:5070;branch=z9hG4bK548gtc308ghhhoccp4g1cbm1bd9v2.1
>>>      From: "WIRELESS CALLER"<sip:[email protected]
>>>
>>> <mailto:sip%[email protected]>;user=phone>;tag=2099232641-1264554945912-
>>>      To: "DSI HOLDING COMPANY 251 DSI Corp"<sip:[email protected]
>>>      <mailto:sip%[email protected]>>;tag=5102113
>>>      Call-ID: [email protected]
>>>      <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>      CSeq: 917280446 INVITE
>>>
>>>      Server: sipXecs/4.0.4 sipXecs/sipxbridge (Linux)
>>>      Supported: replaces
>>>      Contact:<sip:[email protected]:5080;transport=udp>
>>>      Reason: ~~id~bridge;cause=213;text="Relayed Error Response"
>>>      Content-Length: 0
>>>
>>>
>>>      On 1/26/2010 3:26 PM, [email protected]
>>>      <mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>>          This is similar to something I posted a week or so ago about
>>>          trying to forward at the handset level, but I'm assuming it is
>>>          a a completely different issue.
>>>          If a user sets a forward through the web gui and specifies an
>>>          external number, they have an issue if the inbound call to be
>>>          forwarded is also from an external number. The call rings on
>>>          the destination phone, but is disconnected with a click as
>>>          soon as it is answered. If the call is forwarded to an
>>>          internal extension, everything is fine. If the call is
>>>          forwarded to an external number and the caller is on an
>>>          internal phone, everything is fine. This sounds like a
>>>          permission issue, but if so, I don't understand why it makes
>>>          it as far as calling the destination phone , but then
>>>          disconnects when it is answered.
>>>
>>>          The text below is from sipxbridge.log. I didn't want to post
>>>          the phone numbers in question for a automated routine of some
>>>          sort to grab at least, so I changed the 615 area code to 222
>>>          in the logs. All area codes involved in this log are 615. In
>>>          this case, the polycom phone is at 4670142. I set it to
>>>          forward to 5008073. The inbound call came from 2439019.
>>>          10.87.20.5 is my sipx server. pcelbcn0001.dsi.globalipcom.com
>>>          <http://pcelbcn0001.dsi.globalipcom.com>  [172.30.209.62] is my
>>>          Verizon gateway. I would be more than happy to provide any
>>>          more information, but I'm not sure where I should be looking.
>>>
>>>          Sipx 4.0.4, sixbridge, Verizon VOIP, No firewall (not needed,
>>>          private connection), Polycom 450s and 550s - bootrom 4.2.1,
>>>          firmware 3.1.3C split.
>>>
>>>          Thanks as always,
>>>          Matthew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ======================
>>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>>> Fax: 434.984.8431
>>>
>>> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>>> Fax: 434.984.8427
>>>
>>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>>
>>> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
>>> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>>      
>
>
>    

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to