4.1-dev will be 4.2 stable when released. On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:35 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:
> Does 4.1 have a release date? From looking at the roadmap, it appears 4.2 > is the next proposed release. Maybe I'm reading something incorrectly. > I have helped a few of the users get by with the personal attendant, but I > would like to give them an idea as to when I will have something that could > fix their issue. > > > On 1/26/2010 8:57 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Tony Graziano >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> I don't know what "206 no peers available" means from sipxbridge. >>> >>> >> Well, there are two problems at hand here. The 481 error from >> sipxbridge on the re-INVITE -- I believe this to be a sipxbridge bug >> that I have fixed already in 4.1. You can give that a try. >> However, I am curious about why verizon issending a re-INVITE as soon >> as the call is. Perhaps it does not like the fact that you are using >> 10.87.20.5 address in your call setup. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Ranga. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Perhaps someone else can help? >>> ============================ >>> Tony Graziano, Manager >>> Telephone: 434.984.8430 >>> Fax: 434.984.8431 >>> >>> Email: [email protected] >>> >>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: >>> Telephone: 434.984.8426 >>> Fax: 434.984.8427 >>> >>> Helpdesk Contract Customers: >>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: [email protected]<[email protected]> >>> To: Tony Graziano<[email protected]>; >>> [email protected]<[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tue Jan 26 21:12:55 2010 >>> Subject: Re: Can't forward from external number to external number >>> >>> Just 1. 95% of my users have 1 line assigned to 1 phone, and everyone is >>> definitely having the issue. >>> >>> On 1/26/2010 8:01 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: >>> >>> >>>> How many phones is your line registered on? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:40 PM, [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok. Lets try this again. I think I have some better data now >>>> thanks to some help from Tony. I waited until nobody was on my >>>> system, moved all the logs out, immediately made a test call, and >>>> then immediately moved those calls to a temp directory. I ran >>>> merge-logs in that temp directory, opened it in sipviewer, and >>>> attached the merged.xml that was created. >>>> In this test, I was calling from 6155008073 (my cell phone) to >>>> 6159253043 (my Sipx/Desk phone) which was set in the Sipx GUI to >>>> forward to 6155914780 (my home phone). My home phone rung, and the >>>> call was dropped as soon as I answered it. I didn't try to mask >>>> any of my phone numbers in the logs this time. >>>> >>>> I have to guess the 2 parts from merged.xml below indicate a >>>> problem. Googling '481 Peer dialog is null' doesn't get too many >>>> hits. >>>> Sorry for not sending correct or helpful information earlier. >>>> Hopefully what I'm sending now is a little more helpful. I didn't >>>> think I needed to send a screenshot from sipviewer, but I will be >>>> glad to if that would help. >>>> >>>> Thank you all for your help, >>>> Matthew >>>> >>>> Time: 2010-01-27T01:16:12.311000Z >>>> Frame: 29 sipxbridge.xml:378 >>>> >>>> Source: nshpbx1.sipx.voip-sipXbridge >>>> Dest: 10.87.20.5:5060<http://10.87.20.5:5060> >>>> >>>> SIP/2.0 481 Peer dialog is null >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> >>>> 10.87.20.5;branch=z9hG4bK-sipXecs-19e8a5983eb41c5558b4327c16988037cc75 >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.87.20.5:5090 >>>> ;branch=z9hG4bKeca98329a090bdd96d9d633f294be82f333631 >>>> CSeq: 917280447 INVITE >>>> Call-ID: [email protected] >>>> From: "WIRELESS >>>> CALLER"<sip:[email protected]<sip%[email protected]> >>>> >>>> <mailto:sip%[email protected] <sip%[email protected]> >>>> >;user=phone>;tag=2099232641-1264554945912- >>>> To: "DSI HOLDING COMPANY 251 DSI Corp" >>>> <sip:[email protected]>;tag=9df1f5b6 >>>> >>>> Server: sipXecs/4.0.4 sipXecs/sipxbridge (Linux) >>>> Contact:<sip:[email protected]:5090 >>>> <http://[email protected]:5090>> >>>> Supported: replaces,100rel >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> Time: 2010-01-27T01:16:12.321000Z >>>> Frame: 33 sipxbridge.xml:383 >>>> >>>> Source: nshpbx1.sipx.voip-sipXbridge >>>> Dest: 172.30.209.62:5070<http://172.30.209.62:5070> >>>> >>>> SIP/2.0 481 Call leg/Transaction does not exist >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 172.30.209.62:5070;branch=z9hG4bK548gtc308ghhhoccp4g1cbm1bd9v2.1 >>>> From: "WIRELESS >>>> CALLER"<sip:[email protected]<sip%[email protected]> >>>> >>>> <mailto:sip%[email protected] <sip%[email protected]> >>>> >;user=phone>;tag=2099232641-1264554945912- >>>> To: "DSI HOLDING COMPANY 251 DSI >>>> Corp"<sip:[email protected]<sip%[email protected]> >>>> <mailto:sip%[email protected] <sip%[email protected]> >>>> >>;tag=5102113 >>>> Call-ID: [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> CSeq: 917280446 INVITE >>>> >>>> Server: sipXecs/4.0.4 sipXecs/sipxbridge (Linux) >>>> Supported: replaces >>>> Contact:<sip:[email protected]:5080;transport=udp> >>>> Reason: ~~id~bridge;cause=213;text="Relayed Error Response" >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/26/2010 3:26 PM, [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is similar to something I posted a week or so ago about >>>> trying to forward at the handset level, but I'm assuming it is >>>> a a completely different issue. >>>> If a user sets a forward through the web gui and specifies an >>>> external number, they have an issue if the inbound call to be >>>> forwarded is also from an external number. The call rings on >>>> the destination phone, but is disconnected with a click as >>>> soon as it is answered. If the call is forwarded to an >>>> internal extension, everything is fine. If the call is >>>> forwarded to an external number and the caller is on an >>>> internal phone, everything is fine. This sounds like a >>>> permission issue, but if so, I don't understand why it makes >>>> it as far as calling the destination phone , but then >>>> disconnects when it is answered. >>>> >>>> The text below is from sipxbridge.log. I didn't want to post >>>> the phone numbers in question for a automated routine of some >>>> sort to grab at least, so I changed the 615 area code to 222 >>>> in the logs. All area codes involved in this log are 615. In >>>> this case, the polycom phone is at 4670142. I set it to >>>> forward to 5008073. The inbound call came from 2439019. >>>> 10.87.20.5 is my sipx server. pcelbcn0001.dsi.globalipcom.com >>>> <http://pcelbcn0001.dsi.globalipcom.com> [172.30.209.62] is my >>>> Verizon gateway. I would be more than happy to provide any >>>> more information, but I'm not sure where I should be looking. >>>> >>>> Sipx 4.0.4, sixbridge, Verizon VOIP, No firewall (not needed, >>>> private connection), Polycom 450s and 550s - bootrom 4.2.1, >>>> firmware 3.1.3C split. >>>> >>>> Thanks as always, >>>> Matthew >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ====================== >>>> Tony Graziano, Manager >>>> Telephone: 434.984.8430 >>>> Fax: 434.984.8431 >>>> >>>> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected] >>>> > >>>> >>>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: >>>> Telephone: 434.984.8426 >>>> Fax: 434.984.8427 >>>> >>>> Helpdesk Contract Customers: >>>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ >>>> >>>> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? >>>> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
