The problem as he originally explained it stated that AT&T was sending the
signalling to 5080, if this is so, it would not.

Agreed it would "IF" that was not the case. It's a little unclear from the
original thread, in which AT&T stated they had set that up.

We install Ingates and are very happy with them.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Picher, Michael
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  I would think that you absolutely could solve the problem with an Ingate…
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tony Graziano
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:12 PM
> *To:* Andrew Cotter
> *Cc:* Sipx-users list
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Up a creek....
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Cotter <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Anyone have a paddle?
>
> Thank you everyone for the suggestions of the past few weeks.  My saga with
> AT&T may be coming to an end, unfortunately in a negative way.  AT&T is
> starting to pull at straws since they have basically denied my requests for
> both a port  change for signaling (5080 for sipXbridge) and enabling the
> B2BUA feature in their managed router.  Both of which I understand may have
> fixed my issue.
>
> The main issue is that don't support REFER (like a lot of ITSP it sounds)
> which screws up transfers.  This messes with  incoming calls to a handset
> or
> the AA which we need when it comes to transfers.  This basically renders
> the
> AA useless.
>
> Transfers, MOH, etc. too.
>
>
>
> I have a couple of people on their end pulling for me and looking to iron
> this out.  Getting AT&T labs involved, etc.
>
> Couple of options I wanted to run by everyone.  Looking for a sanity check
> if it is possible and how difficult if it could even work.  Some may be
> crazy I know.... Lack of sleep and head is throbbing after banging it
> against the wall repeatedly.
>
> 1) Have AT&T configure their router to do a port mapping (incoming 5060 -->
> 5080)
>
>
>
> No. If you support remote workers you need to understand that this will
> require a lot more on your end.
>
>
> 2) Have AT&T hand this off to us not via SIP, but a PRI
>
>  Don't forget to get a PRI SIP gateway to go with that.
>
>
> 3) Add something in between the SIP trunk and SipX.  InGate? (stab in the
> dark)
>
>  Might work, but if they initiate the signalling on port 5080, it also
> means the call further breaks because they are not routing to your SBC after
> that, so adding an Ingate in will likely see the same result.
>
>
> 4) Ditch the great system called SipX in which I was really looking forward
> to the 4.2 release, for some other open source or commercial product
> (boooooo!)
>
> Anything else?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Andrew
>
>  Ranga swears it is working well with AT&T. Maybe the standard sip
> trunking works, but their FLEX IP product does not, which sits INSIDE your
> network.
>
>
>
> I'd swing a Louisville slugger around and tell them to change the port to
> 5080 or else, but then I would have been through my checklist before signing
> off on anything.
>
>
>
> 1. Get a different ITSP, we sell bandwidth.com and never have these
> issues.
>
> 2. Move from their FLEX (which must be an integrated T1 or something?)
> product.
>
> 3. Have them change the signalling port.
>
> 4. Use a PRI (assuming you need a lot of call paths).
>
>
>
> Truth be told, if they ARE NOT willing to setup signalling on another port,
> it makes me want to run away too.
>
>
>
> Ranga - Do you know what the official AT&T product is called that
> sipXbridge was tested against?
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony
>



-- 
======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: [email protected]

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to