On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dale D <[email protected]> wrote: > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <43932> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > > > I don't think I'm making any assumptions about how the > existing system works, I was just try to specifiy a simple > requirement for a feature that is not related to IMAP at > all. > > One does not need IMAP to send an email via SMTP to a remote > email system. One only needs IMAP to sychronize message > stores. If the local store is not used and the message is > simply sent off to somewhere else, then no IMAP is ever > involved in what I'm proposing. > > I guess I did assume that at the bottom of all the sipXecs > code that sendmail was ultimately used for the delivery of > email off the system...why would one want to write another > SMTP engine? > > Are you saying that sendmail is not used and that outbound > SMTP traffic is implimented via some custom java code that > does not do retries as required by the email RFCs? > > Slow down there pardner.
Like I said, write up a feature request. Better yet help with the coding. In any event, you might be asking sipx to monitor the mail queue to signal it's empty. If there are ANY stuck messages in there, you surely don't want to delete it from the users VM account. If you want to get "around" other stuck messages you have to have sipx monitor the queue and recognize the message number. IF there is an EMAIL RFC for specifically what you're asking it has to be written into sipx to use it. I think that's what IMAP does. In essence, if the same message is in both places, one end can be moved to the deleted folder and IMAP be told to IGNORE that for sync again. So, yes, maybe IMAP would be the way to do this. Ask the sipx-dev list. It sounds simple until you look at the processes and procedures needed to make that happen. What the IMAP synchronization does "HAS" some of those pieces in place, so HOW MANY times does that code need to be rewritten for a single use case scenario like this? It bears discussion, but make a formal feature request via the tracker, define it well so people and dev's can understand and design it, ask people to vote for it. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
