So, sipx doesn't really have any issues with mask size then. That's what I was wondering about.
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:27:58 -0400, JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) wrote: >> Catchy subject eh :). >> >> Anyhow, in the Internet Calling section, then then Intranet >> Subnets section, in my case, I have 192.168.0.0/16. >> Is there any chance that sipx might be unhappy with this mask >> and might prefer a 24, even keeping SIP devices in the same >> segment rather than a 16? >> > Size does matter and generally speaking, your mask must be an accurate > representation of the size of the private subnet that sipXecs is in.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
