I forgot about the conference bridge.
Like I said, I sure would like to use G.729 for our mobile/remote
phones. 8k on their DSL/home broadband is better than taking up 64K.
(At least in theory).
I would also like to find a sip client for my windows mobile (or wait
till I get my android based HTC). G.711 based SIP calls on EVDO
(Verizon) is pitiful.
(skype sounds clear. but the skype/sip isn't what you think it is, and
its still beta)
I have experimented with poly's and setting G.729 as higher priority,
but seems to still come out G.711 unless I disable G.711 on the ITSP.
Same with Cisco's set to G.729. The ITSP switches it to G.711
automagically.
I had assumed 4 licenses to allow 4 concurrent G.729 users (hoping that
if the 5th called, it would switch them to G.711)
Might be worth $40 just to try it. What's the worse that could happen?
On 4/20/10 1:48 PM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
If you want a g729 based caller to terminate at g729 into voicemail,
the AA, or a conference bridge then you would need a license.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
