I may be misunderstanding your configuration, but it seems like if you don't care about AA/Voicemail/Conferencing then the freeswitch license isn't going to help (or hurt) you at all.
If your remote callers would be better off with a different codec you could try to limit the codecs their endpoint s/w or h/w will allow (ie: don't advertise g711 at all, just uLaw and g729). If your remote users are on POTS then your issue is between you and your ITSP and you could limit your ITSP configuration to the codecs you like (for instance with voip.ms I can pick which codecs it will accept, I turned off g711 and gsm so now it always negotiates uLaw which is pretty good; I wish they had g722 as an option too though). -Eric On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I forgot about the conference bridge. > Like I said, I sure would like to use G.729 for our mobile/remote phones. 8k > on their DSL/home broadband is better than taking up 64K. (At least in > theory). > I would also like to find a sip client for my windows mobile (or wait till I > get my android based HTC). G.711 based SIP calls on EVDO (Verizon) is > pitiful. > (skype sounds clear. but the skype/sip isn't what you think it is, and its > still beta) > > I have experimented with poly's and setting G.729 as higher priority, but > seems to still come out G.711 unless I disable G.711 on the ITSP. Same with > Cisco's set to G.729. The ITSP switches it to G.711 automagically. > > I had assumed 4 licenses to allow 4 concurrent G.729 users (hoping that if > the 5th called, it would switch them to G.711) > > Might be worth $40 just to try it. What's the worse that could happen? > > > On 4/20/10 1:48 PM, Eric Varsanyi wrote: >> >> If you want a g729 based caller to terminate at g729 into voicemail, the AA, >> or a conference bridge then you would need a license. > > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 > > | SECNAP Network Security Corporation > Certified SNORT Integrator > 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance > Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness > Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide > King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 > > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap®. > For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
