On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:48 -0400, Saint, David (David) wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > I have managed to get a wireshark trace of the divert to > > voicemail. The key bit of the decode are: > > > > From: "6667912" > > <sip:mailto:[email protected]>;tag=d19c5205-82bd-44fc-88c4 > > -bf5d3c52feb5-37461274 > > > > Diversion: "6667912" > > <sip:mailto:[email protected]>;reason=unconditional;privac > > y=off;screen=yes > > > > To: <sip:mailto:[email protected]> > > > > The actual call flow is 71901 > 6667912 > forwards to vmail > > pilot number 71900. I noticed that the 'From' address is > > always the same as the diversion, is this okay? So, the > > original calling party id is lost. > > > > When the AA answers the call, it appears that it thinks the > > call is from the mailbox owner and prompts for PIN. > > > > Can you confirm whether the From address has to be be the > > original calling party. > > > > In addition I noticed that the format of the diversion header > > was slightly different in that there is no 'tel:' but just > > the number - does this cause any issues? > > > > Thanks for your help > > Abdul > > > > Thanks > > Abdul > > > > > > > > Looking at the sipXecs code I can see the lack of "tel:" will stop the call > triggering a voicemail deposit: > sipXivr/src/main/java/org/sipfoundry/sipxivr/SipXivr.java > Should raise an "Improvement" jira issue to get the "mailto:"; format added. > I don't think the From header will cause a problem in this case.
The forum software is seeing the u...@domain and adding the 'mailto:' on the front of it - it was not in what he posted. (the list server does not do that) _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
