I already answered the Question myself. After removing the unmanaged GW from the dialing rule with permissions the other dialing rule without permission works like a charm.
Is it expected behaviour, that you cannot use a gateway on 2 dialing rules (one with, and one without permissions)? afaik I cannot add an unmanaged GW twice to the same SipX config, right? So how to solve this problem? René 2010/5/7 Rene Pankratz <[email protected]> > Hello, > I have a PSTN GW and another unmanaged GW connected to the SipX (4.0.4). > > Incoming calls from PSTN that match an extension (e.g exact match on ext > "298") shall be routed to the other unmanaged GW. > But unfortunately the SipX wants the PSTN GW to be authenticated and sends > a 407. > > No permission is configured to be needed in the dialing rule for the second > unmanaged GW. Of course incoming calls ID also do not match an existing user > on SipX. > > When I disble the dialing Rule I get a 404 not found. So the dialing rule > is the one that matches. > > I have another dialing rule in my diaplan that needs permissions and also > uses the unmanaged GW. Is it not possible to route calls to specific > extensions without a permission through the GW when another dialing rule > (with permissions) also uses the GW? > > Thanks in advance > René >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
