I've run sipX on Citrix XenServer with no problems, no CPU spikes, etc. 64 bit RPMs are provided, but not an ISO image. I think the mentality behind this is if you're going to be installing sipX in an environment that would require 64 bit then you're probably going to want to do more custom things with the OS therefore no ISO image.
I've never tried sipX in a VMWare environment. On 05/15/2010 03:19 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: > So, case in point. I believe that VMware is not supported by sipXecs. > They are tested at CentOS 5.2 for the current release. They haven't > released the 64 bit version - don't know why - maybe lack of resources, may > be technical issues - might be it drives the CPU through the roof. > > It seems reasonable that the developers should expect that they test on a > standard configuration, and confirm usability on that same platform. When > someone strays beyond that, since it is OpenSource, they do so at their own > risk - and issues. > > Are we doing other things like this with platforms that are giving > undesirable results? Or is it truly a software issue? > > And, I'm not sure I have seen a matrix of what sipXecs 4.2 has been tested > to be compatible with in terms of CPU sizing, memory, etc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:10 PM > To: Todd Hodgen; [email protected]; 'Tony Graziano'; > [email protected] > Cc: 'D. R. Lang'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow > > VMware ESXi > CentOS 5.4 64 Bit > No phones, users, sip trunk, or anything. > I just started building it. I have done nothing but put some phone firmwares > on it, work on the dial plans, etc. It has done this 3 times. > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Todd Hodgen"<[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 11:50:38 > To: 'Tony Graziano'<[email protected]>;<[email protected]> > Cc: 'D. R. Lang'<[email protected]>;<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow > > Before a question to the dev list, it might be reasonable for those that are > seeing this issue to tell what their configuration consist of. I've seen > one here that is on a VM solution. And Tony is indicating he is running PAE > Kernel. > > I recall a message from Scott Lawrence that indicated he didn't think the > PAE Kernal would be an issue, but they had not explicitly tested that > scenario. > > I've seen this behavior once on a customer system, and it went away about > two hours later and I've not seen it since - over 90 days ago. Dual Core > with 4gb. > > Would it not make sense to try and find any common hardware scenarios that > might be contributing to this issue? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano > Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 9:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; D. R. Lang > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow > > I think it's worth a question the the dev list to understand why this > happens. I had one that was so problematic, I started seeing > corruption in the DB and had to manually rebuild the data before it > became useable. > > one can restart the config service from CLI > > sipxproc --restart ConfigServer > > (but I would caution, when I had this happen and did that, I saw a > further diminished capability (could delete users, could not add > users, input aliases, etc.) > > Are these upgrades from 4.0.4 or new 4.2 installs? I would also say I > feel like a decent core duo would be the minimum CPU to keep this from > being painfully slow, and if you are using a 32bit OS, and running > more than 4GB of RAM, ensure you are using the PAE kernel (yum install > kernel-PAE, then change grub to boot to that kernel instead). > > In my hand rebuild, I also made sure a branch was established and all > devices and users were assigned to a branch. I remember in 4.16 and > 4.1.7 having issues with the configUI properly showing me details and > advanced settings, and getting slow, unless I had done so. > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Marcello Manzardo > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have seem the same issue numerous times. Most of the time I can cure it >> > by > >> restarting the management service and of course a complete system restart >> fixes it. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen D. >> Miller >> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 9:09 AM >> To: D. R. Lang; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow >> >> >> For what it's worth, I have seen this multiple times on my new 4.2 >> installation as well. >> >> If you wait long enough (~5 or more minutes), things eventually sort >> themselves out. In the meantime, however, as you indicated, the web UI >> takes about a minute (at least) to navigate from page to page. There >> are no calls active on the system when this occurs. >> >> Anyone else see this behavior? >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>> D. R. Lang >>> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:14 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [sipx-users] Java goes to 89 percent an web console gets slow >>> >>> >>> In sipx 4.2 occasionally the web console gets sluggish or >>> unresponsive. TOP shows the Java utilization constantly at >>> 89 to 92 percent. The system is working from the phone site >>> but can't manage it from superadmin or a user extension. If >>> you wait long enough the utilization on java goes down and >>> you can get to the web menus but you wait 30 seconds for a >>> screen change. The only good recovery is a reboot. Before I >>> gave up and rebooted I received the >>> Message. >>> >>> >>> Java heap space >>> >>> RequestURI=/sipxconfig/admin/commserver/LocationsPage,editLoca >>> tionLink.sdirect >>> >>> Powered by Jetty:// >>> >>> I am running with 2GB of memory and dual processors. >>> >>> >>> Duane Lang >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List >>> Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
