On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Nathaniel Watkins < [email protected]> wrote:
> I may have to draw a picture - but here is the scenario. > > We have an NEC system at the Courthouse (CH) - we also have sipx at the > Courthouse. > We have an NEC system at our Public Works Complex (PWC). > > At Site PWC there are 8 trunks - that allow DID into the NEC system. Is it > possible to provide Trunks from the CH site to the PWC NEC system. > > The goal would be to port their DID numbers to the courthouse PRI (PRI goes > into a Patton) - those DID's would be setup as phantom users in Sipx - which > would forward to 4xxxx - which would route the calls to a gateway located at > PWC (I'm assuming that these types of 'Trunks' could run off an FXO > gateway). The PWC NEC system could then route all calls thru these trunks - > sipx would analyze and route it appropriately. > > The other goal would be to have 4 digit dialing between systems. > > I have several Audiocodes fxo/fxs gateways that could be utilized... > > After typing this scenario - it seems a whole lot easier to just buy IP > phones for the PWC... > > Or should I just scrap the linking two systems together and spring for VOIP > phones at the PWC? We have a single point to point PRI - the far end router > would need updated to support QOS (it is a very old cisco router). > > This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the > individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or > entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, > and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be > secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, > destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County > Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or > omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email > transmission. > > IP makes the most sense. Porting the numbers to the PRI is also a "no brainer" only you might want to leave any analog trunks used for faxing/modems/cc machines in place at the PWC location for simplicity. FXS gateways are very doable if you want to use the old system, but much of your heavy lifting (dial plans) should be configured in the Patton. Granted, much of this depends on funding. IP will have a larger upfront cost, but it will probably save you time and money in the long run with less equipment and simple dial plans. My $.02
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
