>>> Richard Zhao <[email protected]> 06/16/10 10:19 PM >>> >I know that sipXecs has some built-in NAT traversal mechanism but it >needs pinholes on the firewall. That is not acceptable in our >environment.
I'd be interested in hearing why this is not acceptable in your environment. If your using siptrunking you already need to open ports in your firewall as well as if you give users the ability to manager their web portal remotely. Not saying you do not have a valid reason, just like to hear how sipx works or doesn't work for each environment. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
