> We are trying out sipXecs for internal usage. An important > factor for us is NAT traversal. We have some experience with > Microsoft OCS and it uses ICE for NAT traversal. It seems a > good way to handle this. > > I checked sipXecs docs and it is not very clear about how to > configure STUN/TURN for ICE protocol. Does anyone have > experience on this? How should we set up STUN/TRUN server and > have ICE available? I read that OpenSips has an internal STUN > server and it works well. Can I have an internal STUN server > in sipXecs? > > I know that sipXecs has some built-in NAT traversal mechanism > but it needs pinholes on the firewall. That is not acceptable > in our environment.
Pinholes are a necessary condition for the sipXecs NAT traversal solution to work when deployed inside a private network. What about it do you find not acceptable? _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
