Dunno. Before you make that conclusion you should see if FS has anything
else listening on port 5090 after you made that change. sipx has 5090 in
use, but I don;t know about FS.

netstat -l --numeric-ports

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dave Redmore <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Changing the gateway (Freeswitch) to listen on port 5060 fixes the problem.
>  So, it seems that sipXbridge does not like to use a gateway that uses port
> 5090?  Is this a bug?  Can anyone confirm this? Does anyone care?
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Redmore" <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software" <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 1:50:25 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>
> Looking a bit more closely at this, I see that sipXbridge listens on port
> 5090.  I wonder if there is a problem with the fact that my gateway is using
> port 5090?  I am going to try creating a new Sip Profile in FS to listen on
> a different port and see if that helps.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Redmore" <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software" <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:58:15 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>
> Call trace is attached.
>
> Looks to me like sipXbridge is getting the call - sees it needs to go to FS
> IP/Port (173.15.28.101:5090), but then returns the "500" error.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Graziano" <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software" <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:23:01 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>
> call trace? pcap wont show what internal logic and signaling sipx is using
> inside to come to that conclusion. a trace will.
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Dave Redmore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think it is a Freeswitch issue at all.  The call never gets past
>> sipX.  A packet capture on the sipX server shows the Invite come from the
>> phone to sipX, sipX returns a "100 Trying" and then immediately returns the
>> "500 Internal Server Error" - sipX never tries to reach the Freeswitch box
>> in any way - something internal to sipX is dying before it ever gets that
>> far.  From the error message in the packet capture, it looks like sipX
>> chokes when it tries to create the INVITE packet to send on to the gateway
>> (Freeswitch).
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tony Graziano" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software" <
>> [email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 8:51:30 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>>
>> You really need a call trace to get a chance to see what is being sent
>> that generates the "500".
>>
>> I am not sure why you would be using FS in this way without ensuring that
>> FS is rewriting the headers, so I think the issue is going to be "port
>> based". I normally do this with a SBC, because they rewrite headers. I am
>> not sure if FS does that without a lot of work, they have an example on
>> their wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SBC_Setup
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Dave Redmore <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone have any thoughts on this?  I'm not sure where to start
>>> debugging.  Something has tripped up siputilities.java - should I file a bug
>>> report?  I don't think I am doing anything "wrong" in my config and it
>>> doesn't look like a SIP routing/firewall/etc issue.  My next step is to
>>> rework Freeswitch to listen on 5060 and see if that helps - maybe then is a
>>> problem with specifying a different port in the gateway?
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dave Redmore" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Discussion list for users of sipXecs software" <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:25:38 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>>>
>>> Freeswitch is not on the LAN - it is on its own Public IP.  My goal with
>>> this experiment to have my Freeswitch server act as an ITSP using Freeswitch
>>> as a Proxy/Registar.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Tony Graziano" <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:17:13 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>>>
>>> I would suspect you should not be using sipxbridge at all.
>>>
>>> You should instead remove that role from sips and remove the trunks.
>>> Recreate the trunks as "unmanaged gateways" to FS (if FS is indeed
>>> registering to the ITSP).
>>>
>>> Sipx shouldn't have to register to FS I don't think, just be "allowed" to
>>> send it calls, like anything on the lan.
>>>
>>> ============================
>>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>>> Fax: 434.984.8431
>>>
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>
>>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>>> Fax: 434.984.8427
>>>
>>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> To: sipx-users <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tue Oct 05 17:12:57 2010
>>> Subject: [sipx-users] 500 Internal Server Error on Invite
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm doing some experimenting with some different call routing scenarios
>>> and
>>> have run into an issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sipx 4.2.1 installed from ISO with a Polycom 300 and Grandstream GXP2020
>>> phones connected for testing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Having been testing for a while and everything has been working very
>>> well.
>>> Had my ITSP connected via B2BUA with sipXbridge and incoming/outgoing
>>> calls
>>> were fine.
>>>
>>>
>>> I changed the SIP Trunk Gateway that was pointing to my ITSP and pointed
>>> it
>>> to a Freeswitch server that I am running - just to test some ideas. The
>>> Freeswitch server has a public IP and listens on port 5090. I have the
>>> "Address" and "Port" fields pointing to my Freeswitch IP and 5090 in the
>>> main Gateway configuration page and I have "<FS_IP_ADDRESS>:5090>" set
>>> under
>>> the "ITSP Account" settings of the Gateway.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sipx is registered to my Freeswitch server via sipXbridge.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Long Distance" Dial Plan is enabled and configured to use my Gateway.
>>>
>>>
>>> When I try to place a call from a phone - I get back a "500 Internal
>>> Server
>>> Error". A packet capture shows that the phone sends an Invite to sipX,
>>> sipX
>>> returns "100 Trying" and then returns "500 Server Internal Error, with
>>> sipfrag". The Message Body of the packet says "Sipfrag" and "Exception
>>> Info
>>> Unexpected error creating INVITE at Siputilities.java:839"
>>>
>>>
>>> I have googled this error, but not finding any info.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyone have any ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Redmore
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected] List Archive:
>>> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ======================
>> Tony Graziano, Manager
>> Telephone: 434.984.8430
>> sip: [email protected]
>> Fax: 434.984.8431
>>
>> Email: [email protected]
>>
>> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
>> Telephone: 434.984.8426
>> sip: [email protected]
>> Fax: 434.984.8427
>>
>> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
>> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>>
>> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
>> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected] List Archive:
>> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ======================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>
>
> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected] List Archive:
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected] List Archive:
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected] List Archive:
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>



-- 
======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: [email protected]

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to